MALE MATTERS
YEARS AGO, THE MEDIA IGNORED WOMEN'S GENDER ISSUES FOR FEAR OF OFFENDING MEN.

TODAY THEY AND VIRTUALLY ALL OTHER INSTITUTIONS IGNORE MEN'S GENDER ISSUES FOR FEAR OF OFFENDING WOMEN!

GENDER VIEWS SELDOM OFFERED BY BIG MEDIA AND LEADING FEMINISTS

Male Matters Author


Getting the Male Side Heard Is So Frustrating...


Men's Issues



THE TOPICS:

GENDER VIOLENCE

...It Makes Some Feminists Want a World Without Men...


...But what about women's violence? If feminists (and the media) don't take women's violence seriously, why should men take women's opinions seriously? After all, according to ideological feminists' own definition of hate crimes, violence is merely an opinion acted out, a view expressed by behavior.
"If one is to accept the basic principles of equality that feminism advances, then one must accept that women, like men, are capable of the entire range of human action and experience: from the summits of artistic creativity and human compassion, to the depths of debased violence and evil." --Adam Jones

SEXUAL HARASSMENT


"With this I will manipulate your little male brain." But all power carries a price tag.

THE WORLD OF CHILDREN

As society vigorously promotes women's equality in the world of work, it generally impedes men's equality in the world of children.

THE WORLD OF WORK

As society impedes  men's equality in the world of children, it vigorously promotes women's equality in the world of work.

MYTH EXPLODED: WOMEN DO MORE HOUSEWORK (At Male Matters)

posted Thursday, 30 August 2007

  Slate Magazine
the dismal science

Couch Entitlement

   

   Surprise—men do just as much work as women do.

By Joel Waldfogel

Everyone from economists and sociologists to Oprah knows that women work more than men. Their longer combined hours, at the home and at the office, stop men from taking afternoon naps on the couch and cause fights that end with men spending nights on the couch. And yet according to a new study, those longer hours are a myth, because it's just not true that women carry a heavier load.

Three economists, Michael Burda of Humboldt University in Berlin, Daniel Hamermesh of the University of Texas, and Philippe Weil of the Free University of Brussels have analyzed data from surveys in 25 countries that ask people how they spend their time. Some of the countries are rich, like the United States and Germany, some are poor, like Benin and Madagascar, and some are in the middle, like Hungary, Mexico, and Slovenia. The people surveyed were asked to fill in diaries indicating how they spend each segment of their day.

 The 24 hours we all have each day can be divided into four broad activities: "market work" that is, work for pay, typically outside the house; "homework," including housework and child care; "tertiary time," including sleep, eating, and other biological necessities that people can do only for themselves; and the time left over, which is leisure. Leisure is not essential to survival, but we like it.

When Hubby Does Housework....Throughout the world, men spend more time on market work, while women spend more time on homework. In the United States and other rich countries, men average 5.2 hours of market work a day and 2.7 hours of homework each day, while women average 3.4 hours of market work and 4.5 hours of homework per day. Adding these up, men work an average of 7.9 hours per day, while women work an average of—drum roll, please—7.9 hours per day. This is the first major finding of the new study. Whatever you may have heard on The View, when these economists accounted for market work and homework, men and women spent about the same amount of time each day working. The averages sound low because they include weekends and are based on a sample of adults that included stay-at-home parents as well as working ones, and other adults.

In Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands, men actually work more than women, although the differences are small. In Belgium, Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom, women work slightly more, though less than 5 percent. Among rich countries, the largest differences emerge in Italy, where women work eight hours while men work only 6.5, and in France, where women work 7.2 hours and men 6.6.

A couple of caveats to all this newfound equality. First, many knowledgeable people believe that women work more. In a survey by the authors of this study, 54 percent of economists and 62 percent of economics students thought that women work more than men, as did more than 70 percent of sociologists. And while the gender equal-work phenomenon has been noted before, "it has been swamped by claims in widely circulated sociological studies … that women's total work significantly exceeds men's," as the authors put it. Although men in many rich countries do not work less than women, they do enjoy about 20 to 30 minutes more leisure per day (over an hour more in Italy) because they spend less time on sleep and other biological necessities. Men spend almost all of this additional leisure time watching television.

While men and women spend about the same time working in rich countries, women do work more than men in poor countries. And the gap widens as countries get poorer. While in the United States, which has a per capita GNP of roughly $33,000, there is no difference between the amount of male and female work, in Benin, Madagascar, and South Africa, which have a per capita income of less than $10,000, women work one to two hours more per day than men.

So, what explains the difference in the time that men and women spend working in richer vs. poorer countries? It's not a matter of women leveraging their greater earnings in places where they can earn more than men. Alas, there are no such places, and women do not reap greater market rewards in the countries where women work the most relative to men.

The authors of the new study instead think that a social norm explains men and women in rich countries pitch in to the same degree. For both men and women, number of hours of combined market work and homework varies among different regions in the United States. But the male-female work gap remains small everywhere in the country, and in this the authors see evidence of a general equality norm. For example, while people in the South work an average of 7.7 hours per day in and out of the home, and people in the East work eight hours (a daily difference of 20 minutes), the difference between the amount of time that men and women work, again in and out of the home, is only two minutes in the East and 10 minutes in the South. Similar patterns hold when you divide the data by level of education. The most educated quarter of the American population works a combined 8.7 hours, while the lowest educated quarter works 6.3 hours—a difference of more than two hours per day. But when you compare men and women in each education bracket, the difference in their total work is no more than 20 minutes.

Many women with demanding careers tell me that it is women working full-time in the market, not women overall, who work more than comparable men. This study cannot settle that question because it does not report work time separately for people with and without market jobs. But if women with careers work more than men, while women overall work the same amount as men, then women without market jobs must work less than men. Men can use that argument to hit the couch in the afternoon. Or to end up there at night.

Joel Waldfogel is the Ehrenkranz Family Professor of business and public policy at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. His book, The Tyranny of the Market: Why You Can't Always Get What You Want, will be published by Harvard University Press this year.

Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/216426

See also "Feministing's Jessica Valenti Pushes the Myth That Women Have Always Worked Harder Than Men."


tags:      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. paul parmenter left...
Sunday, 2 September 2007 3:05 am

There are two big fallacies in the construction and conclusions of this study, and they are interlinked. The first is that "hours expended" in either of the two "work" areas is the same thing as "doing work". It isn't. The second is that "homework" can be equated with "market work" as if they were both equally demanding or of equal merit. They are not.

These two fallacies are amply demonstrated if you consider firstly a woman conducting "child care" at home by watching TV with a cup of coffee for an hour while the child sleeps or amuses itself playing in a sandpit; and secondly a man spending an hour pouring concrete, shifting furniture or making crucial financial decisions. This study would rate the man's and woman's contribution equally.

Market work has to be more demanding and productive because that is its nature. If you are working for pay, you have to meet certain targets and certain standards; which are usually dictated by somebody else, or the market. With homework however, you only have to satisfy yourself, and there are no standards. Any idiot can do housework; you don't need any qualification because it is that easy. Your "work" rarely if ever gets inspected or measured by anyone. It can be done as well. or as badly, as you choose; or not at all in many cases. That makes a world of difference. Also most housework is now done by gadgets that require little more than the ability to flick a switch.

I remember once reading an article about a woman who claimed she "worked" much "harder" than her husband because she did 100 hours housework a week, while he did a mere 60 hours a week in an office. Her version of these 100 hours of "work" included two hours a day taking and fetching the children from school (by car - very demanding), at least four hours cleaning every day (she must have a spotless house; what could be left to clean?) and an hour a day "fixing the children's breakfast". Presumably this meant she cooked a gourmet meal for them every morning. Strangely, she seemed to have more energy left at the end of the week than her lazy husband, who inexplicably was too tired when he got home to help his heroic wife complete her staggering workload.

Needless to say, her assessment of her 100 hours workload was absolute tosh. Routine, undemanding activities, even those conducted from an armchair, were upgraded to "work" and the hours expended were wildly exaggerated. Anyone genuinely doing 100 hours real work a week (there are only 168 available) would drop dead after a month or two. Yet I have never heard of any woman dropping dead of housework.

By the way, i am not an idle male chauvinist who does not understand what "housework" is. I have done, and continue to do, every type of housework. I looked after myself when I lived alone as a young man, including doing my own shopping, cooking, laundry and cleaning. And I assure you I did not live knee-deep in dirty underwear and discarded pizza boxes and beer cans according to the tired old bachelor stereotype. I lived very cleanly. I can iron my own shirts and darn my own socks. I still fix every one of my own meals, except when I eat out - when it is my money that pays for the meal. When our children were in nappies, it was my job to wash them out and sterilise them - every night (after I got home from my full-time job) for years. I had to use our bath to do so, then clean the bath before it could be used for its intended purpose. That's because we used terry nappies which had to be recycled daily - we could not afford disposables. Not a day off, even at Christmas. Babies don't stop, and I know it. So I know what housework is!

What this study does tell me is that everyone, both men and women alike, have a certain amount of "energy time" each day; but the sexes expend that energy time in different ways - with women generally choosing less demanding ways. Women do not "work" harder, or longer, than men at all. And I doubt if they if they come anywhere near matching the extent of men's "real" work, i.e. the demanding stuff that requires a measurable product, and that carries a penalty for failure.


2. Scott left...
Wednesday, 21 November 2007 1:47 pm

This is a response to the previous comment. Your response is very biased and you did not see the point of this study. This study demonstrated that men and women both do equal work on an average each day. It does not say that one does more demanding work than the other. The study done does not indicate one form of work has a greater role than the other. I am not saying women are equal to men or better than men and vice versa but I am saying that your statement was based on your own opinion rather than studies conducted by sociologists and economists that study this subject and are noted for it.

It is a very interesting study and it makes sense. This is not a study on who does the most "meaningful" work.


Search Site

 



RSS Add-Me









THE GENDER DANCE

He's going round and round because she's going round and round, and she's going round and round because....

FOR EVERY 100 FEMALES...

...The "Privileged" World of Males